MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,079 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20162025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,079 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 42

Labels cover 5 of 2,079 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,079 of 2,079 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Review of Particle Physics
Masaharu Tanabashi, Katsuro Hagiwara, Ken‐ichi Hikasa, K. Nakamura, Y. Sumino, Fuminobu Takahashi +223 more
2018· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7,217
citations
affunlabeled
Review of Particle Physics
S. Navas, C. Amsler, Th. Gutsche, C. Hanhart, J.J. Hernandez, C. Lourenço +237 more
2024· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2,990
citations
afffundunlabeled
Notes on nonsingular models of black holes
Valeri P. Frolov
2016· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
367
citations
348
citations
afffundunlabeled
Supersymmetric Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models
Wenbo Fu, Davide Gaiotto, Juan Maldacena, Subir Sachdev
2017· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
347
citations
afffundunlabeled
Domain wall QCD with physical quark masses
Thomas Blum, P. A. Boyle, Norman H. Christ, Julien Frison, Nicolas Garrón, Renwick J. Hudspith +15 more
2016· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
345
citations
afffundunlabeled
Testing strong-field gravity with tidal Love numbers
Vítor Cardoso, Edgardo Franzin, Andrea Maselli, Paolo Pani, Guilherme Raposo
2017· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
306
citations
affunlabeled
Solar neutrino measurements in Super-Kamiokande-IV
K. Abe, Y. Haga, Y. Hayato, M. Ikeda, K. Iyogi, J. Kameda +161 more
2016· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
301
citations
afffundunlabeled
Projected sensitivity of the SuperCDMS SNOLAB experiment
R. Agnese, A. J. Anderson, T. Aramaki, I. J. Arnquist, W. Baker, D. Barker +90 more
2017· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
291
citations
afffundunlabeled
Measurements of the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math>-mode polarization and temperature-<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math>-mode correlation of the CMB from SPT-3G 2018 data
D. Dutcher, L. Balkenhol, P. A. R. Ade, Zeeshan Ahmed, Ethan Anderes, A. J. Anderson +115 more
2021· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
262
citations
affunlabeled
Improved limits on the tensor-to-scalar ratio using BICEP and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math> data
M. Tristram, A. J. Banday, K. M. Górski, Reijo Keskitalo, C. R. Lawrence, K. J. Andersen +11 more
2022· article· lv· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
257
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Constraining early dark energy with large-scale structure
Mikhail M. Ivanov, Evan McDonough, J. Colin Hill, Marko Simonović, Michael W. Toomey, Stephon Alexander +1 more
2020· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
243
citations
afffundunlabeled
Low-mass dark matter search with CDMSlite
R. Agnese, A. J. Anderson, T. Aralis, T. Aramaki, I. J. Arnquist, W. Baker +101 more
2018· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
228
citations
afffundunlabeled
Trans-Planckian censorship and inflationary cosmology
Alek Bedroya, Robert Brandenberger, Marilena Loverde, Cumrun Vafa
2020· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
222
citations
afffundunlabeled
Testing primordial black holes as dark matter with LISA
N. Bartolo, Valerio De Luca, Gabriele Franciolini, Marco Peloso, Davide Racco, Antonio Riotto
2019· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
222
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About