MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Religious Freedom and Discrimination
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

187 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
187 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 3 of 4

Labels cover 1 of 187 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 187 of 187 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
A Political Theology of Law
Katherine Lemons
2023· article· en· Law & Social Inquiry· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Laïcité versus multiculturalisme?
Christelle Landheer‐cieslak, Mathilde Philip-Gay
2025· book· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Dignity in Judgment
Andrea Pin
2025· book· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Dignity’s Epilogue?
2025· book-chapter· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Contentious Terms
Natalie Ann Ghosn
2024· book-chapter· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Religion and Diversity
Francesca Cadeddu, Oddrun Marie Hovde Bråten
2024· book· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Church of Saints and Sinners
Catherine E. Clifford
2013· article· en· Proceedings of the Catholic Theological Society of America (Catholic Theological Society of America)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Islam in Catalonia
Stephen Schwartz
2010· article· en· Middle East Quarterly· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Book reviews
D. Bruce Hindmarsh, J. Robert Wright, Steve Moyise, David Fergusson, Paul M. Collins, Olav Fanuelsen +2 more
2002· article· en· International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About