MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,805 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,805 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 59 of 77

Labels cover 1 of 3,805 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,805 of 3,805 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affunlabeled
Contaminant containment using polymer gel barriers
M IM Darwish, R. Kerry Rowe, Johan R. C. van der Maarel, L. Pel, Henk Huinink, P. L. J. Zitha
2004· article· en· Canadian Geotechnical Journal· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
Reply to the discussion by Olsen and Stuedlein on “Use of terrestrial laser scanning for the characterization of retrogressive landslides in sensitive clay and rotational landslides in river banks”Appears in Canadian Geotechnical Journal, <b>47</b>(10): 1164–1168.
Thierry Oppikofer, Michel Jaboyedoff, Denis Demers, Jacques Locat, Ariane Locat, Pascal Locat +2 more
2010· article· en· Canadian Geotechnical Journal· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Deep sampling and testing in soft stratified clay
S. J. Cummings, Vinayagamoorthy Sivakumar, I. G. Doran, Jim Graham
2003· article· en· Canadian Geotechnical Journal· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About