MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

49 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
49 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 1

Labels cover 1 of 49 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 49 of 49 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
TestU01
Pierre L’Ecuyer, Richard Simard
2007· article· en· ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
998
citations
affunlabeled
The complex-step derivative approximation
Joaquim R. R. A. Martins, Peter Sturdza, Juan J. Alonso
2003· article· en· ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
736
citations
affunlabeled
Algorithm 909
Sébastien Le Digabel
2011· article· en· ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
627
citations
affunlabeled
KBLAS
Ahmad Abdelfattah, David E. Keyes, Hatem Ltaief
2016· article· en· ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
51
citations
afffundunlabeled
Algorithm 958
Pierre L’Ecuyer, David Munger
2016· article· en· ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
44
citations
affunlabeled
pyMDO
Joaquim R. R. A. Martins, Christopher Marriage, Nathan Tedford
2009· article· en· ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
40
citations
affunlabeled
Algorithm 820
Sebastián Ferrando, Lawrence A. Kolasa, Natasha Kovačević
2002· article· en· ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
40
citations
affunlabeled
Algorithm 890
E. van den Berg, Michael P. Friedlander, Gilles Hennenfent, Felix J. Herrmann, Rayan Saab, Özgür Yılmaz
2009· article· en· ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
35
citations
affunlabeled
Algorithm 917
Piers W. Lawrence, Robert M. Corless, David J. Jeffrey
2012· article· en· ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
30
citations
affunlabeled
HyperNOMAD
Dounia Lakhmiri, Sébastien Le Digabel, Christophe Tribes
2021· article· en· ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
27
citations
affunlabeled
BACOL
R. Wang, P. Keast, Paul Muir
2004· article· en· ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
23
citations
affunlabeled
Hierarchical Matrix Operations on GPUs
Wajih Boukaram, George Turkiyyah, David E. Keyes
2019· article· en· ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
affgemma · no categorygpt · no categorymodels split
Algorithm 965
Benjamin Ong, Ronald D. Haynes, Kyle Ladd
2016· article· en· ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
19
citations
affunlabeled
Inverting the symmetrical beta distribution
Pierre L’Ecuyer, Richard Simard
2006· article· en· ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
19
citations
afffundunlabeled
Algorithm 948
Nedialko S. Nedialkov, John D. Pryce, Guangning Tan
2015· article· en· ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
afffundunlabeled
SYM-ILDL
Chen Greif, Shiwen He, Paul Liu
2017· article· en· ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
12
citations
affunlabeled
Algorithm 874
Rui Wang, P. Keast, Paul Muir
2008· article· en· ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Algorithm 1003
Timothy A. Davis, William W. Hager, Scott P. Kolodziej, Sencer Yeralan
2020· article· en· ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
afffundunlabeled
Algorithm 956
D. A. Aruliah, Lennaert van Veen, Alex Dubitski
2016· article· en· ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
afffundunlabeled
Algorithm 962
Jack Pew, Zhi Li, Paul Muir
2016· article· en· ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affunlabeled
Extended BACOLI
Kevin R. Green, Raymond J. Spiteri
2019· article· en· ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affunlabeled
Algorithm 963
Marcos Escobar, Benedikt Rudolph, Rudi Zagst
2016· article· en· ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software· Economics, Econometrics and Finance
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affunlabeled
Algorithm 978
E. Anderson
2017· article· en· ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
afffundunlabeled
odeToJava
Andrew Kroshko, Raymond J. Spiteri
2015· article· en· ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Intersection of Tetrahedra
Conor McCoid, Martin J. Gander
2025· article· en· ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About