MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

213 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
213 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 4 of 5

Labels cover 1 of 213 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 213 of 213 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Trace Diagnostics for Signal-Based Temporal Properties
Chaima Boufaied, Claudio Menghi, Domenico Bianculli, Lionel Briand
2023· article· en· IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
afffundunlabeled
Static Profiling of Alloy Models
Elias Eid, Nancy A. Day
2022· article· en· IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
afffundunlabeled
Execution of Partial State Machine Models
Mojtaba Bagherzadeh, Nafıseh Kahani, Karim Jahed, Juergen Dingel
2020· article· en· IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affunlabeled
Scoping Software Engineering for AI: The TSE Perspective
Sebastián Uchitel, Marsha Chećhik, Massimiliano Di Penta, Bram Adams, Nazareno Aguirre, Gabriele Bavota +33 more
2024· article· en· IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affunlabeled
Identifying Concepts in Software Projects
Mathieu Nassif, Martin P. Robillard
2023· article· en· IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
afffundunlabeled
Refactoring-Aware Block Tracking in Commit History
Nikolaos Tsantalis, Pouria Alikhanifard
2024· article· en· IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
Do Experts Agree About Smelly Infrastructure?
Sogol Masoumzadeh, Nuno Saavedra, Rungroj Maipradit, Lili Wei, João F. Ferreira, Dániel Varró +1 more
2025· article· en· IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About