MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

5,777 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
5,777 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 62 of 116

Labels cover 12 of 5,777 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 5,777 of 5,777 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
<i>ISN’T IT IRONIC ?</i>
Sébastien Doane
2021· article· fr· Science et Esprit· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
L'écriture comme outil de recherche
Jacques Hillion
2014· article· fr· Actualités en analyse transactionnelle/Actualités en analyse transactionnelle· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Ne meurs pas libellule : 28 octobre
Nathalie Barsalou
2015· article· fr· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
EMOTIONS
J-P LEBEAU
2023· article· fr· EXERCER· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Le sens « caché » des mots inuit
Louis‐Jacques Dorais
2025· article· fr· Revue d’études autochtones· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Du poème au romanesque
Daniel Laforest
2006· article· fr· Voix et Images· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Denise Bombardier, pamphlétaire
Dominique Perron
2006· article· fr· Voix et Images· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Experience et praxeologie
Pierre Maistre
2017· article· fr· Forum· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Jack, Marie. Mariana et Milcza
Pauline Brise
2015· article· fr· Voix Plurielles· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Un mot de la rédactrice
Isabelle Bourgeois
2019· article· fr· Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Chaussure politique
Marc-Antoine Blais
2020· article· fr· Revue critique de fixxion française contemporaine· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About