MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
CEIBS Institutional Repository
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

370 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20022025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
370 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 8

Labels cover 0 of 370 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 370 of 370 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Vanke Property: Puzzle of Turnover
Jian Han, Ziqian Zhao
2016· other· CEIBS Institutional Repository
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Chi Forest: Taking on Coca-Cola
Yue 方跃, 刘耿, 黄夏燕, 吕星航
2024· other· CEIBS Institutional Repository
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
两鲜求解生鲜电商消费升级
Yan Gong, Liman Zhao
2018· article· CEIBS Institutional Repository· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
PhoneWin: Winning in Rural Markets
S. Ramakrishna Velamuri, Yan 龚焱, 赵丽缦
2018· other· CEIBS Institutional Repository
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Shenzhou International Group
Weijiong 张维炯, 赵丽缦
2018· other· CEIBS Institutional Repository
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Q卡：“卡”在那儿？
S. Li, Leiping Xu, Liang Dong
2012· article· CEIBS Institutional Repository· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
CIFI Group (B): Hunkering Down
李秀娟, 张驰
2024· other· CEIBS Institutional Repository
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
ICBC in the Digital Era (B)
Xiaoming Zhu, Qiong Zhu
2014· other· CEIBS Institutional Repository
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
J. Wong: Meizu's Hero or Enemy?
Flora F.T. 蒋凤桐, 张驰, Thomas A. Birtch
2022· other· CEIBS Institutional Repository
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
PhoneWin: Winning in Rural Markets
Yan Gong, S. Ramakrishna Velamuri, Liman Zhao
2018· other· en· CEIBS Institutional Repository
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About